Coefficients multiply, exponents add
(3x²)(4x⁵) = 12x⁷. The coefficients are just numbers, so they multiply. The powers add because x²·x⁵ is two xs times five xs — seven xs. That is Foundations of Algebra's exponent law, unchanged.
One rule covers every polynomial product: distribute until no brackets remain. FOIL is that rule applied to two binomials and is not worth memorising as a separate fact.
Core ideas
Multiplication looks harder than addition and involves one more idea. It is also more mechanical: there is nothing to decide.
(3x²)(4x⁵) = 12x⁷. The coefficients are just numbers, so they multiply. The powers add because x²·x⁵ is two xs times five xs — seven xs. That is Foundations of Algebra's exponent law, unchanged.
Multiply each term of the first polynomial by each term of the second, then collect like terms. Every layout — FOIL, the grid, the vertical arrangement — is bookkeeping for that one instruction.
Degree 3 times degree 4 gives degree 7, always. The leading terms multiply to give the leading term, and two nonzero numbers cannot multiply to zero, so it can never cancel away.
The material
Monomials first, then the general rule, then how to keep track of the pieces.
Multiply the coefficients; add the exponents of each variable separately.
In the second line the x exponents give 3 + 1 = 4 and the y exponents give 1 + 4 = 5. Each variable is tracked on its own; they never mix.
This is the distributive law directly: a(b + c) = ab + ac, with as many terms inside the bracket as you like.
The 3x reaches every term inside the bracket — the same "reaches every term" discipline as the minus sign in “Adding and Subtracting Polynomials”.
To multiply two polynomials, multiply each term of the first by each term of the second and add all the results.
A polynomial with m terms times one with n terms produces mn products before any collecting. Counting them first tells you when you have finished.
For two binomials that count is 2 × 2 = 4, and the four products are traditionally remembered as FOIL — First, Outer, Inner, Last:
FOIL is worth knowing as a memory aid and worth distrusting as a method, because it describes only the 2 × 2 case. Asked for (2x − 3)(x² + 4x − 5) there is no "outer" and "inner" to speak of — there are 2 × 3 = 6 products. The counting rule survives where the acronym does not.
Take the terms of the first polynomial one at a time and distribute each across the whole second polynomial. Write each partial product on its own line, then collect down the columns. Six products written on two lines are far easier to check than six products written in a row.
(2x − 3)(x² + 4x − 5) has degree 1 + 2 = 3, and its leading term is 2x · x² = 2x³ before you multiply anything else. If your answer is not a cubic starting 2x³, something went wrong — and you know it without checking the rest.
Interactive
Every term against every term, then collected
Method
Predict the shape of the answer first; it makes the check free.
Add the degrees; multiply the leading coefficients. You now know the first term of the answer before doing any work, and you will know immediately if the result is malformed.
m terms times n terms is mn products. Write the number down. Missing one term is the second most common error here, and a count catches it.
Take the first term of the first polynomial across the whole of the second, then the next. Never work two terms at once in your head.
Collect by power, highest first, exactly as in “Adding and Subtracting Polynomials”. Then check the leading term against your prediction from step 1.
(2x − 3)(x² + 4x − 5). Degree 1 + 2 = 3; leading term 2x³; 2 × 3 = 6 products owed.
Six products written, six products owed. The leading term is 2x³ as predicted, and the constant term is (−3)(−5) = 15 — which is always just the product of the two constant terms, another free check.
At x = 1: the factors give (2 − 3)(1 + 4 − 5) = (−1)(0) = 0, and the answer gives 2 + 5 − 22 + 15 = 0. Agreement.
For a faded product, take (x + 2)(2x² − x + 3). The supplied prediction is degree 3, leading term 2x³, and 2 × 3 = 6 partial products. Write those six products, collect, and test x = 1. The result is 2x³ + 3x² + x + 6, and both forms give 12; a missing x² term means one of the two middle products was skipped.
For any product you should be able to say the degree, the leading term, the constant term and the number of partial products before writing a line of working — and then use all four to check the result. That is what makes “Factoring Out the Greatest Common Factor” onward, where you run this process backwards, feel like a search rather than a guess.
Something to change about this lesson? Write it down, tick it off when it is handled, and export the list when you want to act on it. Kept in this browser only: nothing is sent anywhere, and nobody is notified.
No recommendations yet for this lesson.