One root gives only one exponential
With a zero discriminant the formula returns the same root twice. C₁·e^(rt) + C₂·e^(rt) is (C₁ + C₂)·e^(rt), which has one constant: it fits a starting value and cannot also fit a starting rate.
When the discriminant is zero the quadratic has one root, and e^(rt) is only one solution, which would leave the equation with a family of one constant. The second solution is t·e^(rt), and the lab verifies it exactly, so the general solution is (C₁ + C₂·t)·e^(rt) and the two constants can again be fitted from a start and a rate.
Core ideas
Three ideas: why the usual form falls short, which second function takes its place, and how the constants are read.
With a zero discriminant the formula returns the same root twice. C₁·e^(rt) + C₂·e^(rt) is (C₁ + C₂)·e^(rt), which has one constant: it fits a starting value and cannot also fit a starting rate.
The function t·e^(rt) has the rate (1 + r·t)·e^(rt) and a second rate (2r + r²·t)·e^(rt). Substituted into the equation, the result is a multiple of a·r² + b·r + c plus a multiple of 2a·r + b, and both are zero when r is the repeated root.
Because t = 0 in (C₁ + C₂·t)·e^(rt) leaves C₁, the starting value is y(0) = C₁. The starting rate adds the two sources, y′(0) = r·C₁ + C₂, since (C₁ + C₂·t)·e^(rt) has the rate (r·C₁ + C₂ + r·C₂·t)·e^(rt).
The material
Why a single exponential is not enough, the substitution that shows t·e^(rt) works, and a fit with both constants.
When the discriminant b² − 4ac is 0, the quadratic formula gives r = −b/(2a) once. For y″ + 4y′ + 4y = 0 the quadratic is r² + 4r + 4 = (r + 2)², and r = −2 is its only root. That gives e^(−2t), and its multiples, a family with one constant.
A family with one constant cannot fit two starting values. The equation y″ + 4y′ + 4y = 0 with y(0) = 1 and y′(0) = 1 needs C = 1 from the first and, since (C·e^(−2t))′ = −2·C·e^(−2t), −2·C = 1 from the second. The two demands disagree, and a second solution must be found.
If r is the only root of a·r² + b·r + c = 0, then t·e^(rt) is a solution of a·y″ + b·y′ + c·y = 0, and the general solution is (C₁ + C₂·t)·e^(rt).
The product rule gives (t·e^(rt))′ = (1 + r·t)·e^(rt) and (t·e^(rt))″ = (2r + r²·t)·e^(rt).
Substituting, a·y″ + b·y′ + c·y is [(a·r² + b·r + c)·t + (2a·r + b)]·e^(rt). The first bracket is zero because r is a root. The second is zero because a repeated root is r = −b/(2a). So the residual is zero.
That t·e^(rt) is the second solution is verified here. That these two are all the solutions is stated, and “Superposition and the Wronskian” shows why they can fit any starting values.
□
For y″ + 4y′ + 4y = 0 and y = t·e^(−2t) the rates are y′ = (1 − 2t)·e^(−2t) and y″ = (4t − 4)·e^(−2t). Then y″ + 4y′ + 4y = [(4t − 4) + 4(1 − 2t) + 4t]·e^(−2t) = 0, because the t terms are 4 − 8 + 4 = 0 and the constants are −4 + 4 = 0.
With y(0) = 1 and y′(0) = 1, the first condition gives C₁ = 1. The second is −2·C₁ + C₂ = 1, so C₂ = 3, and the solution is (1 + 3t)·e^(−2t). The factor 1 + 3t grows, but e^(−2t) shrinks faster, so the solution rises at first and then decays, a shape that one exponential cannot make.
For y″ = 0 the quadratic is r² = 0 with r = 0 twice, and the general solution is (C₁ + C₂·t)·e^(0·t) = C₁ + C₂·t, a straight line. That is right: a function with a zero second rate has a constant first rate, so it is a line.
With y(0) = 1 and y′(0) = 2 the line is 1 + 2t, and the lab prints the constants C₁ = 1, C₂ = 2.
The repeated root is a boundary case. A tiny change in b makes the discriminant positive or negative and the form of the solution changes, though the solution itself changes only a little. It is also the case the next course uses, as the dividing line between motion that overshoots and motion that does not.
Interactive
Roots, the general solution and the constants, exactly
Method
Five moves. The one that is new is the second solution.
b² − 4ac = 0. Then the single root is r = −b/(2a).
e^(rt) and t·e^(rt). The second is the first with a factor of t.
y = (C₁ + C₂·t)·e^(rt). The factor C₁ + C₂·t is a line in t.
C₁ = y(0) and C₂ = y′(0) − r·C₁. Substitute the numbers; keep the fractions.
Differentiate twice by the product rule and check the residual. A forgotten factor of t fails here.
One root, the second solution checked, and both constants fitted.
The lab prints the same solution expanded, as 3·t·e^(−2t) + e^(−2t). The fifth line is the exact check: the t terms cancel and so do the constants, and the lab's status line reports a residual of 0.
Note that C₂ is 3 and not 1. The starting rate is 1, but −2·C₁ already contributes −2, so the second term has to supply 3.
You should be able to recognise a zero discriminant, write (C₁ + C₂·t)·e^(rt), check t·e^(rt) by substitution, and solve C₁ = y(0) and r·C₁ + C₂ = y′(0) exactly.
Something to change about this lesson? Write it down, tick it off when it is handled, and export the list when you want to act on it. Kept in this browser only: nothing is sent anywhere, and nobody is notified.
No recommendations yet for this lesson.