The radical sign names the principal root
√9 is 3, not ±3. Both 3 and −3 square to 9, but the symbol denotes the non-negative one so that √ is a function. The ± in the quadratic formula is written explicitly because the symbol does not supply it.
The second half of the course opens the way the first did: with the values that are not allowed. An even root demands a non-negative radicand, the principal root is a single number rather than two, and both facts show up in the identity √(x²) = |x|.
Core ideas
A radical sign is not an instruction to find every number that works. It names one specific number, and which one depends on whether the index is even or odd.
√9 is 3, not ±3. Both 3 and −3 square to 9, but the symbol denotes the non-negative one so that √ is a function. The ± in the quadratic formula is written explicitly because the symbol does not supply it.
An even power is never negative, so √(−4) names nothing real and −4 is outside the domain. An odd power keeps its sign, so ∛(−8) is −2 with no difficulty at all.
√200 is not made simpler by a decimal. It is made simpler by writing 200 = 100 · 2 and taking the perfect square out, leaving 10√2 — an exact value in a form that can be compared and combined.
The material
The definitions first, then the two rules that do the simplifying and the condition attached to them.
For an integer n ≥ 2, b is an nth root of a if bⁿ = a. In ⁿ√a the number n is the index and a is the radicand. With no index written, the index is 2.
When n is even and a ≥ 0, ⁿ√a denotes the non-negative root. When n is odd, ⁿ√a denotes the unique real root, which has the same sign as a. When n is even and a < 0, ⁿ√a is not a real number.
That last clause is the radical half's version of "the denominator is not zero". It is a restriction on the domain, it is decided before any algebra happens, and no manipulation later can be allowed to lose it. √(−4) is treated here as undefined; Quadratics and Complex Numbers introduces i and gives it a value.
For every real x, √(x²) = |x|.
The left side is non-negative by definition of the principal root, so the right side must be too. Writing √(x²) = x asserts something false for every negative x: at x = −5 the left side is 5 and the right side is −5.
More generally ⁿ√(xⁿ) is |x| when n is even and x when n is odd. The absolute value is not decoration. It is the price of an even power destroying sign information that the root then cannot restore.
ⁿ√a · ⁿ√b = ⁿ√(ab) and ⁿ√a / ⁿ√b = ⁿ√(a/b), provided every radical named is defined — for even n that means a ≥ 0 and b ≥ 0, and b ≠ 0 in the quotient.
The condition is not fine print. Without it one could write √(−4) · √(−9) = √36 = 6, and the left side is not a real number at all.
Notice what is absent: there is no rule for ⁿ√(a + b). Roots distribute over multiplication and division and over nothing else. √(9 + 16) is √25 = 5, while √9 + √16 is 7. This is the same shape of error as cancelling a term rather than a factor in “Simplifying Rational Expressions”.
√(50x³) simplifies to 5x√(2x). No absolute value is needed: for the expression to be defined at all, 50x³ ≥ 0 forces x ≥ 0, and a non-negative x is its own absolute value. The domain did the work that | | would otherwise have to do.
Interactive
The factorisation decides what comes out
Method
Four steps. The first decides whether there is anything to do at all.
Even index with a negative radicand: stop, it is undefined here. Odd index: any real number is fine, and a negative sign may be brought out front.
For a square root look for the largest perfect square that divides it; 200 = 100 · 2 in one step beats 200 = 4 · 50 in three.
ⁿ√(cⁿ · d) = c · ⁿ√d by the product rule. For an even index with a variable base, this is where |x| appears unless the domain already forces the base non-negative.
Look at what remains under the radical. If any factor is still a perfect nth power, another complete group can come out and the answer is not yet simplified.
One numeric square root, one odd index with a negative radicand, and one with variables.
In (b) the sign came out with the root because the index is odd. Had the index been even, there would have been nothing to do — the expression would not name a real number and the work would stop at the first line.
In (c) the domain restriction was written before simplifying, exactly as in “Rational Expressions and Their Domains”, and it makes √(3x) defined. The extracted factor is x², already non-negative, so √(x⁴) = x² needs no bars. The bars are genuinely at stake in the earlier √(50x³) = 5x√(2x): extracting √(x²) first gives |x|, and only the domain condition x ≥ 0 lets that become x.
For a faded variable pass, simplify √(18t²). The supplied factorisation is 18t² = 9 · 2 · t²; decide the domain, extract both square factors and preserve the principal-root sign. Check against 3|t|√2, defined for every real t. Writing 3t√2 reveals that the absolute value was dropped even though negative t is allowed.
Given any radical you should be able to say whether it is defined, simplify it exactly, and justify each extraction by the product or quotient rule with its hypothesis checked. Knowing that √200 = 10√2 matters less than knowing why √(−4) · √(−9) is not 6.
Something to change about this lesson? Write it down, tick it off when it is handled, and export the list when you want to act on it. Kept in this browser only: nothing is sent anywhere, and nobody is notified.
No recommendations yet for this lesson.