Multiplication is across the top and across the bottom
a/b · c/d = (ac)/(bd), with no adjustment of denominators. It is the one fraction operation that needs no preparation, which is why division is converted into it.
Multiplication of algebraic fractions is exactly multiplication of numerical ones, and division is multiplication by the reciprocal. The only genuinely new thing is that dividing forbids more values than it looks like it forbids.
Core ideas
No common denominator is needed here — that is “Adding and Subtracting Rational Expressions”'s problem. What this lesson demands is that you factor first and that you account for a divisor which may itself be zero.
a/b · c/d = (ac)/(bd), with no adjustment of denominators. It is the one fraction operation that needs no preparation, which is why division is converted into it.
a/b ÷ c/d = a/b · d/c. Dividing by c/d asks what you must multiply c/d by to reach a/b, and d/c undoes c/d because their product is 1.
The factors are already visible before multiplying and buried afterwards. Expanding (x − 2)(x + 2)(x + 3) first turns a one-line cancellation into a cubic you then have to factor again.
The material
Two theorems, then the value that only division forbids.
For rational expressions with b ≠ 0 and d ≠ 0, (a/b)·(c/d) = (ac)/(bd). The domain of the product excludes every zero of b and every zero of d.
For b ≠ 0, d ≠ 0 and c ≠ 0, (a/b) ÷ (c/d) = (a/b)·(d/c) = (ad)/(bc). The three conditions are each doing work, and the third is the one that is easy to lose.
Why c ≠ 0? Because a/b ÷ c/d means dividing by the number c/d, and that number is zero exactly when c is zero. Dividing by zero is undefined whether the zero arrives as a plain 0 or as a fraction with a zero on top.
In (x² − 4)/(x² + 6x + 9) ÷ (x − 2)/(x + 3), the visible denominators (x + 3)² and x + 3 forbid x = −3. But the divisor (x − 2)/(x + 3) is zero at x = 2, so x = 2 is forbidden too — and after you flip, x − 2 sits in a denominator where you can finally see it.
This is the general pattern: flipping the divisor turns its numerator into a denominator, and a denominator is something you already know how to read. Record the exclusion at the moment of flipping, because the factor x − 2 is about to cancel and disappear.
With the exclusions safely written down, the mechanical part is short. Factor every numerator and denominator, cancel any factor that appears on both levels of the combined fraction, and only then write the product.
(x + 1)/(x − 5) · (x − 5)/(x + 2). The factor x − 5 is on top of the second and on the bottom of the first, so it cancels: the answer is (x + 1)/(x + 2) with x ≠ 5 and x ≠ −2. Multiplying first would have produced (x² − 4x − 5)/(x² − 3x − 10) and the same cancellation, harder.
There is no rule about numerators here to match the one about denominators in “Adding and Subtracting Rational Expressions”. A product needs no common denominator, so the temptation to find one is worth resisting: it is extra work that cannot help.
Interactive
Invert and multiply, and the exclusion that move creates
Method
For division, step one is the flip; everything after is the same.
Rewrite ÷ c/d as · d/c before doing anything else, so that the rest of the problem is a single product.
Every numerator and every denominator, completely. Nothing can be cancelled until this is done.
Zeros of both original denominators, plus the zeros of the divisor's numerator if you divided. That last group vanishes from the answer.
Strike common factors across the whole product, then write the remaining factors on each level. Leave the answer factored.
A division with three separate exclusions, one of which is invisible in the final answer.
Both x − 2 and one x + 3 cancelled, and with them went every trace of why 2 is not allowed. (x + 2)/(x + 3) evaluated at x = 2 gives 4/5, a number the original division cannot produce, because at x = 2 it asks you to divide by 0.
For a faded quotient, simplify (x² − 1)/(x² + 3x + 2) ÷ (x − 1)/(x + 2). The supplied first move is to flip the divisor and immediately add x ≠ 1 to the exclusions. Factor, cancel and record the two original denominator zeros yourself. The result is 1, with x ≠ −2, −1, 1; missing 1 means the divisor's numerator was never checked, while missing −1 means a cancelled original factor erased its restriction.
You should convert a division to a product without thinking, and still stop to record the zeros of the divisor's numerator. The arithmetic here is the easiest in the course; the bookkeeping is what distinguishes a correct answer from a nearly correct one.
Something to change about this lesson? Write it down, tick it off when it is handled, and export the list when you want to act on it. Kept in this browser only: nothing is sent anywhere, and nobody is notified.
No recommendations yet for this lesson.