A quartic has no formula in this course, and Polynomials and Factoring's rational root search is a general tool that can miss irrational roots entirely. But a quartic with no odd powers is not really a quartic: it is a quadratic wearing x² where a quadratic wears x, and renaming that part is enough to finish it exactly.
Definition · Quadratic formAn equation is in quadratic form if it can be written au² + bu + c = 0 with a ≠ 0, where u = f(x) is some expression in x. The test is that the same inner expression appears to the first and second powers, with no other dependence on x; doubled exponents are one common clue, not the definition.
x⁴ - 5x² + 4 = 0
put u = x², so x⁴ = (x²)² = u²
u² - 5u + 4 = 0
(u - 1)(u - 4) = 0
u = 1 or u = 4
now back to x
x² = 1 → x = ±1 x² = 4 → x = ±2
four solutions: x = -2, -1, 1, 2
The substitution is legal because it is a renaming in both directions. Every x satisfying the original gives a u = x² satisfying the quadratic, and every u satisfying the quadratic gives back exactly the x with x² = u — two of them, one, or none, depending on the sign of u. Nothing has been done to the equation; part of it has been given a shorter name.
Values of u that give no real x
Example · x⁴ - 3x² - 4 = 0With u = x²: u² - 3u - 4 = (u - 4)(u + 1) = 0, so u = 4 or u = -1. Back-substituting, x² = 4 gives x = ±2, while x² = -1 has no real solution, since a square of a real number is never negative.
So this quartic has two real solutions, not four. The count of u values and the count of x values are different numbers, and only the second answers the question.
Over the complex numbers of “Complex Numbers”, “Operations with Complex Numbers” and “Complex Roots of Quadratics” the story is different: x² = -1 gives x = ±i, so the same quartic has four complex solutions, 2, -2, i and -i. Which answer is wanted depends on which number system the question is asked in, and that is worth stating in the answer.
Radicals and negative exponents
Example · x - 5√x + 6 = 0Put u = √x, so u² = x and the equation is u² - 5u + 6 = 0, giving u = 2 or u = 3. Then √x = 2 gives x = 4, and √x = 3 gives x = 9. Both check: 4 - 10 + 6 = 0 and 9 - 15 + 6 = 0.
The domain is x ≥ 0 throughout, since √x is defined nowhere else, and both answers respect it.
The restriction earns its keep in x + √x - 6 = 0. There u² + u - 6 = (u + 3)(u - 2) = 0 gives u = 2 or u = -3, but √x is never negative, so u = -3 is discarded before it is squared. Squaring it anyway would produce x = 9, and 9 + 3 - 6 = 6, not 0 — an extraneous solution of exactly the kind Rational and Radical Expressions warned about.
Example · x⁻² - x⁻¹ - 6 = 0Put u = x⁻¹ = 1/x, so u² = x⁻² and u² - u - 6 = (u - 3)(u + 2) = 0, giving u = 3 or u = -2. Then 1/x = 3 gives x = 1/3 and 1/x = -2 gives x = -1/2. Here a negative u is perfectly acceptable — the restriction that matters for this substitution is x ≠ 0, not a sign.
The inner expression need not be a power. In (x² - 3)² - 2(x² - 3) - 8 = 0, put u = x² - 3: then u² - 2u - 8 = (u - 4)(u + 2) = 0, so u = 4 or u = -2, giving x² = 7 and x² = 1. The four solutions are ±√7 and ±1. Expanding the brackets first would have produced the same quartic the long way round.
One manipulation to avoid: reducing the degree by dividing by a power of x. x⁴ = 4x² becomes x²(x² - 4) = 0 by factoring, with solutions 0, 2 and -2; dividing both sides by x² returns x² = 4 and silently loses x = 0. Dividing by something that might be zero deletes solutions, in this course and in every later one.
A last check worth making: Polynomials and Factoring fixed that a polynomial of degree n has at most n real solutions. A quartic that comes back with five, or a solution that fails when substituted, means the return journey went wrong — usually by squaring a rejected u or by forgetting a ±.