Equal slopes mean parallel, provided the lines are different
If the intercepts also agree the two equations describe one line, which is not usually what "parallel" is meant to include. Check b as well as m before answering.
Parallel lines have equal slopes; perpendicular lines have slopes whose product is −1. Both tests are stated for lines that have slopes, which leaves the vertical case to be handled separately and deliberately.
Core ideas
Both relationships are about direction alone, and slope is exactly the number that captures direction. That is why both tests are one line long.
If the intercepts also agree the two equations describe one line, which is not usually what "parallel" is meant to include. Check b as well as m before answering.
Flip the fraction and change the sign: 2/3 becomes −3/2. Doing only one of the two operations is the standard error, and each alone leaves a line that is not perpendicular to anything relevant.
m₁m₂ = −1 presupposes two slopes. A vertical and a horizontal line are perpendicular by geometry, but no product can show it because one slope does not exist.
The material
One test for each relationship, then the case the tests exclude.
Two distinct lines are parallel when they never meet. For non-vertical lines this happens exactly when their slopes are equal.
The connection to slope is easy to believe and easy to justify: equal slopes mean equal rise per unit run, so the vertical gap between the lines is the same at every x. If that gap is zero the lines coincide, and if it is anything else they never touch.
In slope-intercept form the test is pure inspection. y = 2x + 1 and y = 2x − 5 are parallel: same m, different b. This is what “Slope-Intercept Form” was buying — and note that 4x − 2y = 10 is the second of those lines in disguise, which no amount of staring at the standard form would reveal.
Two lines are perpendicular when they meet at a right angle. For lines with slopes m₁ and m₂, this happens exactly when m₁m₂ = −1, equivalently m₂ = −1/m₁.
The negative and the reciprocal do separate jobs, and separating them is what makes the rule stick. The reciprocal exchanges rise and run — a quarter turn swaps the horizontal and vertical legs of the slope triangle — and the negative sign reverses direction, because a quarter turn sends a rising line to a falling one.
Every line of that table is one calculation: flip, then negate. The last row is the one to remember as a picture — y = x and y = −x visibly cross at a right angle, and their slopes multiply to −1.
A vertical line x = a and a horizontal line y = b are perpendicular; you can see the right angle. But the horizontal line has m = 0 and the vertical line has no slope, so the product test cannot be applied: there is no second number to multiply, and 0 times anything is 0, never −1.
This is not a flaw in the rule, it is the rule's stated scope. The theorem is about lines that have slopes. Handle vertical lines by recognising them first: perpendicular to a vertical line means horizontal, and perpendicular to a horizontal line means vertical, both settled without any arithmetic.
Parallel: same slope −3, so y − 2 = −3(x − 1) gives y = −3x + 5. Perpendicular: slope 1/3, so y − 2 = (1/3)(x − 1) gives y = (1/3)x + 5/3. Both pass through (1, 2), and −3 × 1/3 = −1.
Notice the shape of both answers: identify the required slope, then hand it to “Point-Slope and Standard Form”'s point-slope form. Every question of this type reduces to those two moves, and the only new content in this lesson is how to get the slope.
Interactive
The product of the slopes, and when there is no product
Method
Get the given slope, transform it, then it is “Point-Slope and Standard Form”.
Solve for y and read m. If there is no y the given line is vertical — jump to the exception and answer y = k or x = k directly.
Parallel: the same m. Perpendicular: flip the fraction and change the sign. Do both operations, and say the new slope aloud before using it.
y − y₁ = m(x − x₁). The point comes from the question and is not affected by which relationship was asked for.
Substitute the point into your final equation, then confirm the slopes are equal, or that their product is −1. Two checks, because there are two ways to get this wrong.
The given line is already in slope-intercept form, so m = −3 is there to be read.
The constant in the perpendicular case comes out as 2 − 1/3 = 5/3. Fractions are the normal result here and rounding them to 1.67 throws away the exactness that made the check 6/3 = 2 conclusive.
Both checks are worth doing. The point check catches an arithmetic slip in the simplification; the slope check catches having flipped without negating, which the point check would happily pass.
For a faded pair, use the point (−2, 3) and the line 2x + 5y = 10. The supplied first move is y = −(2/5)x + 2, so the given slope is −2/5. Find the required parallel and perpendicular slopes, build both lines through the point, and perform both the point check and the relationship check.
Given four lines — one in standard form, one vertical, one horizontal, one with a fractional slope — and a point, you should produce both companions for each and justify the vertical case in words. Knowing why the product test does not apply there is the difference between using a theorem and reciting it.
Something to change about this lesson? Write it down, tick it off when it is handled, and export the list when you want to act on it. Kept in this browser only: nothing is sent anywhere, and nobody is notified.
No recommendations yet for this lesson.