A reference class is the group whose rate is used
To say that a person’s chance of an outcome is 1 in 5 is to say that 1 in 5 in some group the person belongs to has the outcome.
A statistic is a rate in a group, and it reaches an individual only through the group chosen. A person belongs to many groups with different rates, and a pooled rate is the rate of one more group. The lab prints the rate in each class and in their union from the same counts.
Core ideas
Evidence about a population is used for an individual by reading the individual into a class. The step is easy to take without noticing.
To say that a person’s chance of an outcome is 1 in 5 is to say that 1 in 5 in some group the person belongs to has the outcome.
Smokers, cyclists, people of sixty, smokers who cycle: each has its own rate, and the data do not choose among them.
Adding the counts of two groups gives the rate of their union. It depends on how many are in each group, and it is the answer to a question about the union.
The material
One person, several rates, and counts that make each of them exact.
A man of sixty smokes and cycles daily. Asked how likely he is to die of heart disease before seventy-five, a doctor can consult tables. The counts below are invented, so that every rate is a clean fraction.
He is a smoker, so 1/5 applies. He is a smoker who cycles, so 1/20 applies. He is a person who cycles, a person of sixty, a person who lives in his city, and each of those has a rate of its own. All of these are statements about groups he belongs to, and the two rates above differ by a factor of four.
A reference class is the group whose rate of an outcome is taken as the probability of that outcome for one case. The reference class problem is that a case belongs to many such groups, with different rates, and the counts do not say which to use.
A practical rule is to use the narrowest class that has enough data. The lab shows the cost on both sides. The class of smokers who cycle gives 1/20, but it rests on 100 people and 5 deaths, and the lab, which treats counts as exact rates and estimates nothing, cannot tell how far that figure can be trusted. The class of smokers gives 1/5 on ten times as many people and ignores the cycling.
The rate for smokers, 1/5, is the pooled rate of the two groups beneath it: add the deaths, 5 + 195 = 200, add the totals, 100 + 900 = 1000, and divide. It is not the average of 1/20 and 13/60, which would ignore that nine in ten smokers here do not cycle. The pooled rate sits close to the larger group’s rate because the larger group supplies most of the counts.
Nothing makes the pooled rate “the” probability. It is the probability for a smoker chosen at random from this population, which is the right answer to a question about that, and the wrong one to a question about a man who cycles.
The effect can be larger than a difference in size. In a well-known set of counts, two treatments for kidney stones are compared by stone size. The open operation has a higher success rate than the keyhole procedure for small stones, 81/87 against 234/270, and for large stones, 192/263 against 55/80. Pooled, it is 273/350 against 289/350, and the keyhole procedure is ahead.
A patient with a large stone asks which treatment to choose. The pooled figures answer a question about patients whose stones might be of either size, and he is not one of them. The reason the pooled comparison reverses, which is that the two treatments were given to different mixes of patients, belongs to Science, Induction and Causation, where it is called Simpson’s paradox; here it only shows that the choice of class can change which treatment looks better.
A rate in a class is a conditional credence given membership, in the sense of the earlier lesson. Learning that he also has a family history puts him in a narrower class and changes the number again. The probability for an individual is relative to what is known about him, and the lab only divides.
Interactive
the same counts, compared group by group and all together
Method
The order that makes the choice of class visible.
Everything you know about him that you have a count for. Each is a candidate.
Cases with the outcome over cases in the class. Keep the counts beside the fraction so you can see how much data each rests on.
To combine two classes, add numerators and denominators. Averaging the rates gives the wrong answer unless the classes are the same size.
If the rates differ, the data have not chosen between them. Say what reason you have for the one you use.
“1 in 20 of smokers who cycle”, not “his chance is 1 in 20”. The sentence should carry its class.
From the counts above, the rates that apply to him.
Two of these rates are about classes he is in, and they differ by a factor of four. The pooled 1/5 is not wrong; it is the rate for smokers whether or not they cycle, and he is a smoker who does.
You should be able to compute the rate of an outcome in two classes and in their union from counts, say why the pooled rate is not the average of the rates, and state for a given individual which classes apply and why the figure for one differs from the figure for another.
Something to change about this lesson? Write it down, tick it off when it is handled, and export the list when you want to act on it. Kept in this browser only: nothing is sent anywhere, and nobody is notified.
No recommendations yet for this lesson.