The laws are counting, not memory
x² · x³ is two xs multiplied by three xs, which is five xs. If you cannot recall whether the exponents add or multiply, write the factors out for a small case and read the answer off.
Three laws, each of which is counting factors rather than remembering a rule. A zero exponent and a negative exponent are then defined — not derived — and the definitions are chosen as the only ones that keep the three laws true for every integer.
Core ideas
The laws are short enough to memorise and short enough to rederive. Rederiving them is better, because it also tells you when they do not apply.
x² · x³ is two xs multiplied by three xs, which is five xs. If you cannot recall whether the exponents add or multiply, write the factors out for a small case and read the answer off.
"Multiply x by itself zero times" is not a meaningful instruction. The quotient law is what forces the value: extended to equal exponents it makes x³ / x³ into x⁰, and arithmetic makes it 1, so x⁰ must be 1. The definition is designed backwards from the law it has to preserve.
x² · y³ does not combine, and 2³ · 3² is 72 — a number, not a power of anything you can read off. The laws move exponents around when the base is the same and say nothing otherwise.
The material
Where each law comes from, why zero and negative exponents have the values they do, and where the distribution stops.
For an integer n ≥ 1, xⁿ means the product of n factors of x. x is the base and n is the exponent.
x¹ = x. Note that this definition says nothing at all about n = 0 or n negative; those cases are handled below, and they have to be handled separately.
For a base x and positive integers m and n: xᵐ · xⁿ = xᵐ⁺ⁿ; xᵐ / xⁿ = xᵐ⁻ⁿ when x ≠ 0 and m > n; and (xᵐ)ⁿ = xᵐⁿ.
The first: xᵐ is m factors and xⁿ is n factors, so their product is m + n factors, which is xᵐ⁺ⁿ.
The second: in xᵐ / xⁿ each of the n factors below cancels one of the m above, leaving m − n factors.
The third: (xᵐ)ⁿ is n copies of a block of m factors, so mn factors in all.
□
Two more, and they are the ones that get overextended: (xy)ⁿ = xⁿyⁿ and (x/y)ⁿ = xⁿ/yⁿ for y ≠ 0. An exponent distributes over a product and over a quotient. It does not distribute over a sum: (x + y)² is not x² + y², and at x = 1, y = 3 those are 16 and 10.
Neither case is covered by the laws as stated, because those were proved for positive exponents by counting factors. So ask instead what the laws would say if they were extended, and let arithmetic say what the value would then have to be:
For x ≠ 0 and a positive integer n: x⁰ = 1 and x⁻ⁿ = 1/xⁿ.
These are definitions, not consequences. They are the only values that keep the three laws true for every integer exponent, which is the reason they were chosen. 0⁰ is left undefined on this course, because both arguments above need x ≠ 0.
A negative exponent does not make the value negative. 2⁻³ is 1/8, a positive number. The exponent's sign says which side of the fraction bar the power belongs on; the value's sign comes from the base.
That gives a useful move: a factor may cross the fraction bar if its exponent changes sign. x⁻²/y⁻³ is y³/x². It is not a new rule — it is the definition applied twice.
(2x⁻³y²)⁻². The outer exponent distributes over the product: 2⁻² = 1/4, (x⁻³)⁻² = x⁶ and (y²)⁻² = y⁻⁴. Collecting, that is x⁶ / (4y⁴), valid for x ≠ 0 and y ≠ 0.
Interactive
By the law, and by writing the powers out
Method
Outermost first, then one base at a time, then the negatives. Changing that order is what produces stray factors.
An exponent on a bracket distributes over every factor inside it, including the numerical one: in (2x³)⁴ the 2 is raised too, giving 16x¹². It distributes over a quotient as well, and over a sum never.
Gather all the powers of x, then all the powers of y, then the plain numbers. Each base is tracked separately and they never mix, so this turns one hard problem into three easy ones.
Do the arithmetic on the exponents while they are still exponents — adding −6 and −1 is easier than manipulating two nested fractions. Move factors across the bar only once the exponents are final.
Every quotient law and every negative exponent needs its base to be nonzero. Writing x ≠ 0 beside the answer is not pedantry; in Rational and Radical Expressions the excluded values become the first thing you are asked for.
(2x³y⁻²)⁻² · (4x⁻¹y³), with x ≠ 0 and y ≠ 0.
Four exponent arithmetics decided the whole thing: 3 · (−2) = −6 and (−2)(−2) = 4 inside the first bracket, then −6 + (−1) = −7 and 4 + 3 = 7. Every one of them is signed integer addition or multiplication, which is why the bracket-and-sign care of “Order of Operations” matters here.
Check at x = 2 and y = 3. The first bracket is 2 · 8 · (1/9) = 16/9, and (16/9)⁻² = 81/256. The second factor is 4 · (1/2) · 27 = 54. Their product is 4374/256, which reduces to 2187/128. And y⁷/x⁷ is 2187/128. Agreement at one pair of values is not a proof, but a disagreement would have been decisive.
For the faded pass, simplify (3x⁻²)²x⁵ with x ≠ 0. Keep the exponent arithmetic visible: the bracket gives 9x⁻⁴, then −4 + 5 = 1, so the answer is 9x. An answer of 9x⁹ added before applying the outer power; 3x forgot that the outer square also applies to the coefficient.
Derive x⁰ = 1 from a quotient, explain where x ≠ 0 enters, and simplify (2a⁻³b²)² · 3ab⁻¹ with restrictions stated. The test is whether each addition or multiplication of exponents can be tied to one law, not whether the final expression looks compact.
Something to change about this lesson? Write it down, tick it off when it is handled, and export the list when you want to act on it. Kept in this browser only: nothing is sent anywhere, and nobody is notified.
No recommendations yet for this lesson.